Nihilo sanctum estne?

I recall when the first iPod came out in 2001.  It was revolutionary – 1000 songs on a portable and extremely attractive hard drive!   Less than two years after the release of the iPod, Apple launched the iTunes Store.   It was one thing to fit [a portion of] your CD collection onto an iPod, it was another to be faced with the reality that said CDs were no longer useful; one can simply purchase and download digital files which would be synced up with your iPod in minutes.  One need not drive to the record store only to find out that the record they intended to buy was no longer in stock (and would, say, Best Buy even carry a Danielson record?!).  Soon the iPod (or any MP3 player for that matter) would be easily adaptable to all settings: one’s car or one’s living room, through a portable stereo in the park or strapped to one’s arm during a workout.  The sale of CDs has steadily dropped since the introduction of the iPod and similar devices and CDs are quickly becoming a thing of the past.

Although I often despise the association, I am of the CD generation.  My family made excessive use of cassette tapes (especially my father’s Van Halen and Eric Clapton and my mother’s Fleetwood Mac and The Beach Boys), but CDs were around for four years before I was even born.  I remember my first two CDs: Weezer’s first self-titled record (aka The Blue Album) and Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness by The Smashing Pumpkins.   Since then, my collection has grown considerably.  Still, even with the hundreds of CDs I’ve collected over the last fifteen years, I can fit four times as many on my 120 GB iPod.  With services like iTunes, eMusic, Lala, Amazon, etc., complete MP3 albums can be downloaded for a fraction of the price of a new CD, and unless one has some high-end headphones or a high-end stereo system (a lot of $, £, €, ¥,…) the difference between a standard MPEG audio file (160 kbps) and a standard CD (1200 kbps) is rather unnoticeable.

With all of this technological allure some people are still unsettled by the change.   I myself prefer to have the album in my hands because I appreciate creative packaging design to a near-obsessive degree.  Any look inside a [post Pablo Honey] Radiohead album booklet would quickly convince one of the inferiority of an exclusively digital musical experience (even such an experience with a picture of an album cover on a computer screen).   And while we already have the platform for digital music (computers and MP3 players) couldn’t we save on so much physical consumption by switching exclusively to digital music?   Even when considering environmental issues like the possibility reducing the production of plastics and paper, I find this option difficult to stomach for the same reason that I find digital books difficult to stomach.   There’s something to having a physical CD/package and a physical book in one’s hand…or is there?

Mass production of recorded music didn’t exist until about a quarter of the way into the 20th century.   At that time the vinyl phonograph record was the standard and it could only play from two-to-three minutes of music per side.  By 1949, vinyl records were in 12-inch LP (45-minute long play) form.  This became the standard length of a record.  Eventually this was followed by the use of magnetic tape: the 8-track cassette in the late sixties and early seventies followed by the compact cassette, which could generally play up to 45 minutes of music.

In a recent interview with Paste, Sufjan Stevens expressed his own crisis with regard to this whole shift in the way we can experience music:

I’m wondering, why do people make albums anymore when we just download?  Why are songs like three or four minutes, and why are records 40 minutes long?  They’re based on the record, vinyl, the CD, and these forms are antiquated now.  So can’t an album be eternity, or can’t it be five minutes? … I no longer really have faith in the album anymore.  I no longer have faith in the song.

Perhaps we find ourselves in this crisis with Sufjan, but while he remains skeptical, I remain hopeful.  From 2006 to 2007, vinyl record sales jumped more than 85%, and from 2007 to 2008 vinyl record sales jumped another 89%.  Yes, collecting vinyl records is extremely trendy and hip at the moment, and yes, when these hipsters accidentally become parents or are forced into real life via some other circumstance they might realise that investing their money in vinyl records solely for the propagation of their hipster image is not very hip after all.  But I still believe that these market figures are indicative of a basic human need for ritual and tradition of some sort.

It is true that there is nothing particularly sacred about the length of an LP or a cassette or a CD, but does the freedom of the age of digital music distribution and consumption require that we abandon the [recent] traditions we’ve grown up with?   Just because the technology moves along and just because we move along with it doesn’t mean that we can’t slow down and savour the beauty and simplicity of the traditional way we experience recorded music, packaging included.  After all, music is art and art is aesthetic and aesthetic is beauty and beauty, as Kant has defined for us in the Third Moment of his Critique of the Power of Judgment, “is the form of the purposiveness of an object, insofar as it is perceived in it without representation of an end.”

I see great correlations between this issue, ritual, and Church tradition, but that’s for another post.

[Elijah adds: Pet Sounds added to Listening]

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

About Elijah

My name is Elijah and I am a proud Angeleño-Glaswegian. I serve as Minister of Queen's Park Govanhill Parish Church. My other interests include life in active community, writing, performing and partaking of music, collecting vinyl records, hiking/outdoors, urban exploration, Celtic FC and the Detroit Tigers.

8 responses to “Nihilo sanctum estne?”

  1. Greg says :

    I feel the same way about books. There was an IVP dictionary series that was offered on CD-rom, but it just felt so wrong to have these magisterial works that would weigh many, many pounds and take up a few bookshelves reduced to this little disk I could hold so lightly in my hand. The substance, the WEIGHT of the knowledge contained in those volumes was somehow slighted by the form.

    It’s a bit different, but you get my drift…

  2. Greg says :

    And don’t forget about the little messages etched onto the vinyl…

    http://forums.morrissey-solo.com/archive/index.php/t-58925.html

    • Elijah says :

      I love to find etchings in vinyls – it’s another part of the thrill of buying plastic music. In fact, on the Viva Hate I finally got around to finding/purchasing the etching reads, “EDUCATION IN REVERSE” and on The Clash it reads “No Thing CAN change…” on Side 1 and “The Shape of Things To Clash” on Side 2.

  3. Dante Stack says :

    But you have good memories! Your first CD was Weezer. Mine was Savage Garden. Why would I want to remember that?

  4. Barber says :

    My first CD was In The Kingdom by Whitecross. Man, I lusted after that long beautiful hair.

  5. Mark says :

    I use to swear by owning actual cd’s, and used to always crack open a new one and listen to the whole thing on the couch while reading the liner notes and looking at the pictures. But that was in college and high school when I had nothing but free time. My opinion has definitely become more open to just digital once my free time to sit around decreased.

    I love the advancement of technology… but for some reason doubt that I would ever buy a 3 hour digital album or Sufjan’s hypothetical 5-minute one. The 3-4 minute average song length and 10-12 track album just feels natural now and I don’t see that changing too much.

  6. Katherine says :

    I totally agree that there is something of value that is lost if CDs fall by the wayside. I also don’t have the luxury of time to really sit down and carefully look through all the liner notes, etc., the way I used to, but I still buy the majority of my music in CD form partly because I’m apparently old and set in my ways (one of my students actually tried the ringtone that old people aren’t supposed to be able to hear in class to see if I’d notice, and I came thisclose to crushing his phone under the heel of my shoe) but I think the bigger reason is that I am a tactile person and I like the fuller experience of the music that comes with its packaging. I like having it be rooted in something physical that I can hold in my hands. And don’t even get me started on books, Greg. Yes, part of me thrills a little at the idea of how much luggage space a Kindle could free up for me, not to mention how much time I could save not having to agonize over which combination of books to pack every time I take a trip, but the thought of digital books replacing the real thing–the paper, the ink, the binding, the SMELL–makes me want to, oh I don’t know, rend my clothing and put ashes on my head.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: